| 38 | 0 | 54 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
为掌握松散承压含水层下厚煤层开采覆岩破坏及导水裂隙发育规律,综合运用理论分析、数值模拟和相似模拟试验相结合的研究方法,对顾北煤矿14321上限工作面采用分层开采和综放开采的安全煤柱高度、导水裂隙带发育高度和覆岩垮落形态进行了对比分析。研究结果表明:上分层开采时,应留设的防砂安全煤柱高度25.04 m,小于实际最小基岩厚度38.90 m,裂隙带发育高度为39.00 m,位于基岩面附近,覆岩垮落形态呈梯形,与一般工作面相似;综放开采时,应留设的防砂安全煤柱高度为69.77 m,裂隙带发育高度为106.5 m,已经波及到中部含水层。针对厚煤层俯斜开采上提工作面,设计了从切眼开始先分层开采,待基岩逐渐增厚,采用放顶煤的差异化放煤技术,并在顾北煤矿14321工作面获得了成功应用。
Abstract:In order to grasp the overlying strata failure and water conducting fracture zone development law of thick coal seam mining under unconsolidated confined aquifer, the research methods including theoretical analysis, numerical simulation and similar simulation experiments were comprehensively applied to compare and analyze the safety coal pillar height, water-conducting fracture zone development height and overlying rock collapse morphology of the 14321 upper exploitation limitationhe ightened working face in Gubei Coal Mine by layered mining and fully mechanized top coal caving mining. The results show that: when using upper layer mining, the sand-prevention safety coal pillar height that should be left is 25.04 m, which is less than the actual minimum bedrock thickness of 38.90 m.The height of the developed fracture zone is 39.00 m, located near the bedrock surface, and the collapse shape of the overlying rock is trapezoidal, similar to that of a general working face. However,when using fully mechanized top coal caving mining, the sand-prevention safety coal pillar height that should be left is 69.77 m, and the height of the developed fracture zone is 106.5 m, which has already affected the central aquifer. A differentiated top coal caving technology was designed for the inclined mining of thick coal seams, which starts with layered mining from the cutting hole and gradually thickens the bedrock before top coal caving. This technology has been successful applied in the 14321 working face of Gubei Coal Mine.
[1]李星亮,黄庆享.水体下特厚煤层综放开采导水裂隙带高度发育特征研究[J].采矿与安全工程学报,2022,39(1):54-61.
[2]许家林.煤矿绿色开采20年研究及进展[J].煤炭科学技术,2020,48(9):1-15.
[3]王晓振,许家林,韩红凯,等.顶板导水裂隙高度随采厚的台阶式发育特征[J].煤炭学报,2019,44(12):3740-3749.
[4]侯俊领,谢广祥,唐永志,等.厚冲积层薄基岩采场围岩三维力学特征[J].煤炭学报,2013,38(12):2113-2118.
[5]葛如涛,陈陆望,王迎新,等.基于改进AHP法和CRITIC法耦合赋权的松散承压含水层富水性评价[J].合肥工业大学学报,2023,46(4):519-528.
[6]张东升,李文平,来兴平,等.我国西北煤炭开采中的水资源保护基础理论研究进展[J].煤炭学报,2017,42(1):36-43.
[7]张杰,杨涛,索永录,等.基于隔水土层失稳模型的顶板突水致灾预测研究[J].煤炭学报,2017,42(10):2718-2724.
[8]许延春,杜明泽,李江华,等.水压作用下防砂安全煤岩柱失稳机理及留设方法[J].煤炭学报,2017,42(2):328-334.
[9]王晓振,许家林,吴玉华,等.松散承压含水层下重复采动对覆岩破断特征的影响研究[J].采矿与安全工程学报,2017,34(3):437-443.
[10]郭文兵,吴东涛,杨伟强,等.兴运煤矿河流下厚煤层开采安全性分析和防控技术[J].采矿与安全工程学报,2024,41(2):305-314.
[11]武强,许珂,张维.再论煤层顶板涌(突)水危险性预测评价的“三图-双预测法”[J].煤炭学报,2016,41(6):1341-1347.
[12]周长建,乔洋,张洪水,等.考虑断层渗透性的断层防水煤柱合理尺寸留设研究[J].煤炭技术,2025,44(2):86-90.
[13]刘树新,丁凯,郑旭,等.压力水作用下防水煤柱蠕变特征及模型研究[J].煤炭技术,2023,42(9):104-108.
[14]林厚阅,牛博,许国胜,等.黔北地区重复开采覆岩“两带”发育特征研究[J].煤炭技术,2025,44(8):23-26.
[15]李志华,华心祝,杨科,等.基于综合指数法的上提工作面压架危险性评价[J].采矿与安全工程学报,2015,32(3):389-395.
[16]国家安全监管总局,国家煤矿安监局,国家能源局,国家铁路局.建筑物、水体、铁路及主要井巷煤柱留设与压煤开采规程[M].北京:煤炭工业出版社,2017:23-25.
[17]许延春,刘世奇.水体下综放开采的安全煤岩柱留设方法研究[J].煤炭科学技术,2011,39(11):1-4,22.
[18]李志华,耿倩,杨科,等.综采工作面垮落带注浆充填开采覆岩采动裂隙定量表征试验研究[J].中国矿业,2024,33(2):159-167.
[19]邹恩龙,李志华,马军,等.采动裂隙动态演化定量分析及其应用研究[J].矿业研究与开发,2023,44(7):101-107.
基本信息:
DOI:10.13301/j.cnki.ct.2026.02.003
中图分类号:TD823.83
引用信息:
[1]李群,李志华,华心祝,等.水体下厚煤层开采安全性分析和差异化放煤技术[J].煤炭技术,2026,45(02):12-18.DOI:10.13301/j.cnki.ct.2026.02.003.
基金信息:
国家重点研发计划项目(2019YFC1904304)
2025-08-21
2025
2025-11-07
2025
1
2026-02-03
2026-02-03